Move-Up Recommendations
For most fire departments, the location of stations across your jurisdiction was typically laid out to meet NFPA response standards. Over time, however, communities change and develop often leaving the configuration less than optimal. This evolutionary inefficiency is compounded by a fluctuating increase in call volume that more frequently finds crews out of quarters. Then, when resources are committed for long periods, the stress on the system becomes even more apparent. While the effect of missing response numbers can be minimized with a 90th percentile score, it is more difficult to obtain forgiveness from an individual citizen whose only interaction happens to be one of your exceptions.
Given unlimited reserves, every station could be staffed with multiple crews, but that is seldom our reality. Allocating the limited resources available right now in preparation for every likely response is not simple. Out of habit, we tend to move the same apparatus up when a busy station goes dark. We seldom consider, or have the tools that allow us to know, if filling that recognized gap is actually improving our overall capabilities or not. In some cases, we may make the situation worse by moving an apparatus from an immediate potential hotspot to fill an apparent gap in 24/7-based coverage. When resource levels prevent adequate attention everywhere, it is critical to move the most appropriate apparatus to the most useful location. We must consider the time-sensitive dynamics of the risks we face.
Given unlimited reserves, every station could be staffed with multiple crews, but that is seldom our reality. Allocating the limited resources available right now in preparation for every likely response is not simple. Out of habit, we tend to move the same apparatus up when a busy station goes dark. We seldom consider, or have the tools that allow us to know, if filling that recognized gap is actually improving our overall capabilities or not. In some cases, we may make the situation worse by moving an apparatus from an immediate potential hotspot to fill an apparent gap in 24/7-based coverage. When resource levels prevent adequate attention everywhere, it is critical to move the most appropriate apparatus to the most useful location. We must consider the time-sensitive dynamics of the risks we face.